The intersection of a global climate emergency and the entrenched economy and technology of the aviation sector presents a significant carbon management challenge. As the opportunity to limit global warming narrows, the efficacy of state-led regulation to drive rapid, systemic decarbonisation requires scrutiny and consideration.

At the conference of Britain’s governing Labour Party in Liverpool last week, two protesters squeezed in a white elephant costume with “carbon capture and storage” written on it. Last month, Nature published a paper suggesting underground carbon dioxide storage capacity is much less than previously thought. These two happenings link a continuing hostility from environmentalists towards one of our key climate technologies.

It often begins with bold declarations - “We must protect our industries,” they say. “Our workers deserve better.” The public nods along. Tariffs, once again, are wielded as a political tool, dressed in the noble language of national interest and economic revival.

Japan is indeed in the midst of something major, something truly extraordinary... The country has embarked on the Green Transformation (GX), which refers to transforming “entire industrial and social structures centering around fossil energy sources, long established since the Industrial Revolution, into ones based on clean energy”

The future of carbon capture and storage (CCS) now hangs in a rather delicate balance. With the new US administration in place - a regime that, let’s say, views net zero goals with the enthusiasm of a cat facing a bath - there is an undeniable shift in momentum. While the Inflation Reduction Act remains intact for now, bolstered by the fact that undoing it would require a Herculean act of Congress, the prevailing sentiment in Washington has turned from cautious optimism to so

In today's rapidly changing world, it has become more crucial than ever for businesses to take steps towards reducing their carbon footprint. By implementing sustainable practices, companies can not only lessen their impact on the environment but also benefit their bottom line in the long run. Here are some effective strategies that businesses can adopt to minimize their carbon footprint: Energy Efficiency: One of the most impactful ways for a business to reduce its carbon fo

In today’s world, the importance of carbon management and environmental advocacy cannot be overstated. As we aim to build a sustainable future for our planet, it is essential for individuals and organizations to engage with carbon management practices. Whether you’re a seasoned environmental advocate or just starting on your journey, here are some tips to help you make a positive impact.

The Nature paper, ‘A prudent planetary limit for geologic carbon storage’, was authored by a group of heavyweight climate scientists, mostly from European universities and research institutions. It applies several limitations on subsurface carbon dioxide storage, calculating that this reduces possible storage from estimates of 10,000-40,000 gigatonnes in the scientific literature, to about 1,460 gigatonnes.

TINA is not just a name: it is a slogan and an investment strategy. There Is No Alternative (TINA) is a guide when the options before us look unappetising but necessary. And the same applies to energy technologies, particularly the unloved quartet of nuclear power, carbon capture and storage (CCS), carbon dioxide removal, and hydrogen.

This month (January 2025), President-elect Donald Trump signalled his intent to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, reigniting a contentious debate on climate policy.

Since 2020, the global hydrogen project pipeline has grown sevenfold, a reflection of the increasing recognition of hydrogen as a critical component in the clean energy transition. According to the latest report from the Hydrogen Council, the number of hydrogen projects has risen from 228 in 2020 to 1,572 in 2024, with investments rising from $90 billion to $680 billion during the same period.

ExxonMobil says carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS) will be a $4 trillion market by 2050. Most reputable climate analysts find CCUS is essential to meeting our climate targets. Environmental groups, with a few honourable exceptions, loathe it. But perhaps the most important question is – can it make money, and how much?